Mayor says that "science can not be segir few assets and the public is entitled to participate in decisions that touch about his life and environment "and it works journalism Scientific, between fear and hope, because although science subjects arouse interest, they also reveal a disturbing scientific ignorance can cause widely varying reactions, although the scientific ignorance being part of a broader ignorance.
must realize that what the scientist wants to send is not always what the journalists want to be passed as these seek to awaken the reader's interest and sometimes the interest in capturing the public leads to sensationalism a leading scientist in the prevention of fear as the news will or what will be the holder. Ideally
arrive at a symbiosis between journalists and scientists, taking into account that both are distanced by a problem of "time": the journalist is to pressure the speed with which you have to understand the issue, choose the most important and understandable to write the reader, and who want to get the basics on a topic without resorting to formulas and without losing the rigor and clarity. If scientific news require caution when communicating them to Publicom this is most necessary medical information, because we have to publish a story with a careful and nuanced language, no firm conclusions.
The aim of science journalism should be to produce citizens more informed and therefore more free to choose
hope to contribute our grain of sand from this Blog. Nacho
Padró
0 comments:
Post a Comment